:::
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Collaborative Project Identity Formation Process in Complex Projects

Emmanuel Nyameke, Harri Haapasalo, Kirsi Aaltonen

Abstract


Currently, the increase in relational project contracts and integrated project deliveries indicates that companies should collaborate to facilitate more effective project delivery in industrial projects. Collaborative project identity is considered a core concept in the evaluation of processes involved in collaborations between industrial projects. The concept implies that a single identity, one in which collaborative values, collaborative working practices and cooperation are central, is beneficial to a project organisation’s self-image and can distinguish the organisation from other project organisations.

Therefore, this research aims to examine the processes involved in the formation of collaborative project identity in an industrial project. This identity cultivates a sense of joint belonging and a culture of cooperation that contributes to the success of a project. In order to acquire an in-depth understanding of this phenomenon, two projects were qualitatively researched as a case study of the processes involved in the formation of collaborative project identity in the delivery of an industrial project. More specifically, organisational documents, project materials, workshop materials, project websites and interviews were used as data collection sources.

The findings of this study revealed five steps in the formation of collaborative project identity: (1) establishing a collaborative sense of meaning and purpose; (2) establishing a sense of shared responsibility; (3) building mutual trust among all participants; (4) Establishing workforce diversity; and (5) designing appropriate collaborative project management information systems. These research results could be used to support the development and management of high-performing collaborative project teams. They could additionally assist collaborative project organisations in actualising the innovation potential of all participants collaborating in joint projects – in the best interest of the project.


Keywords


collaborative project identity, complex projects, collaborative project delivery methods

References


Aapaoja A., Herrala M., Pekuri A. and Haapasalo, H. 2013. The Characteristics of and Cornerstones for Creating Integrated Teams. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. Vol. 6 Iss: 4, pp. 695 – 713, doi: 10.1108/IJMPB-09-2012-0056.

Aarseth, W., Andersen, B., Ahola, T., & Jergeas, G. (2012). Practical difficulties encountered in attempting to implement a partnering approach”, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 266-284, doi: 10.1108/17538371211214941.

Ahlemann, F. (2009). Towards a conceptual reference model for project management information systems. International Journal of Project Management 27 (2009) 19–30, doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.01.008.

Ahola, T., Kujala, J., Laaksonen, T., & Aaltonen, A. (2013). Constructing the market position of a project-based firm. International Journal of Project Management 31 (2013) 355–365, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.008.

Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organisational identity, in Cummings, L.L., Staw, M.M. (Eds.), Research in Organisational behavior. pp. 263–295.

Bakker, R. M., Knoben, J., Vries, N., & Oerlemans, N. A. G. (2010). The nature and prevalence of inter-Organisational project ventures: Evidence from a large-scale field study in the Netherlands 2006-2009. International Journal of Project Management. International Project Management Association, 29(6), pp. 781–794, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.04.006.

Braglia, M., & Frosolini, M. (2014). An integrated approach to implement Project Management Information Systems within the Extended Enterprise. International Journal of Project Management 32 (2014) 18–29, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.12.003.

Bresnen, M. (2009). Living the Dream? Understanding Partnering as Emergent Practice, Construction Management and Economics, 27, 923-933, doi: 10.1080/01446190902974145.

Chen, G., Zhang, G., Xie, Y.‐M., & Jin, X.‐H. (2012). Overview of alliancing research and practice in the construction industry. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 8, 103‐119, doi: 10.1080/17452007.2012.659505.

Chen, J., Zhang, C., & Xu, Y. (2009). The Role of Mutual Trust in Building Members' Loyalty to a C2C Platform Provider, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 14:1, 147-171, doi: 10.2753/JEC1086-4415140105.

Chen, Y. Q., Lu, H., Lu, W., & Zhang, N. (2010). Analysis of project delivery systems in Chinese construction industry with data envelopment analysis (DEA). Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 17(6), 598–614, doi: 10.1108/09699981011090215.

Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioural Theory of the Firm. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Dietrich, P., Eskerod, P., Dalcher, D., & Sandhawalia, B. (2010). The dynamics of collaboration in multipartner projects. Project Management Journal, Vol. 41 No. 4, pp. 59-78, doi: 10.1002/pmj.20194.

Engebø, A., Lædre, O., Young, B., Larssen, P. F., Lohne, J., & Klakegg, O. J. (2020). Collaborative project delivery methods: a scoping review. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 26(3), 278-303, doi: 10.3846/jcem.2020.12186.

Engebø, A., Skatvedt, Å., & Torp, O. (2019). Soft elements in collaborative project delivery methods. In 27th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC). Dublin, Ireland, doi: 10.24928/2019/0192.

Ey, W., Jian Z., & Sangwon H. (2014) Barriers and challenges of collaborative procurements: An exploratory study, International Journal of Construction Management, 14:3, 148-155, doi: 10.1080/15623599.2014.922725.

Gioia, D. A., Price, K. N., Hamilton, A. L., & Thomas, J. B. (2010). Forging an identity: An Insider-outsider Study of Processes Involved in the Formation of Organisational Identity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 1–46, doi: 10.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.1.

Gioia, D. A., Patvardhan, S. D., Hamilton, A. L., & Corley, K. G. (2013). Organisational Identity Formation and Change. The Academy of Management Annals, 7, 123-193, , doi: 10.1080/19416520.2013.762225.

Hietajärvi, A. M., & Aaltonen, K. (2018). The formation of a collaborative project identity in an infrastructure alliance project. Construction Management and Economics, 36(1), 1–21, doi: 10.1080/01446193.2017.1315149.

Holme, I. M., & Solvang, B. K. (1997). Forskningsmetodik: om kvalitativa och kvantitativa metoder. (2. ed) Lund: Student literature.

Karim, A. J. (2011). Project management information systems factors: an empirical study of their impact on project management decision making performance. Research Journal of Economics, Business and ICT. ISSN 2045-3345.

Kourti, I. (2017). Why should we collaborate? Exploring partners’ interactions in the psychosocial spaces of an inter-organisational collaboration. Scandinavian Journal of Management. 33 (2017) 93–101, doi: 10.1016/j.scaman.2017.03.002.

Kujala, J., Ahola, T., & Huikuri, S. (2013). Use of services to support the business of a project-based firm. International Journal of Project Management, 31(2), pp.177–189, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.07.007.

Laan, A., Voordijk, H., & Dewulf, G. (2011). Reducing opportunistic behaviour through a project alliance. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 4, 660–679, doi: 10.1108/17538371111164065.

Lahdenperä, P. (2012). Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery. Construction Management and Economics, 30, 57-79, doi: 10.1080/01446193.2011.648947.

Luo, Y. (2002). Building trust in cross-cultural collaborations: Toward a Contingency Perspective. Journal of Management 2002 28(5) 669–694, doi: 10.1016/S0149-2063(02)00161-7.

Lundin, R. A., & Soderholm, A. (1995). A theory of the temporary Organisation. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), pp. 437–455, doi: 10.1016/0956-5221(95)00036-U.

Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd ed., SAGE Publications, London.

Miller, J. B., Garvin, M., J., Ibbs, C. W., & Mahoney, S. E. (2000). Toward a new paradigm: Simultaneous use of multiple project delivery methods. Journal of Management in Engineering, 16(3), 58–67, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2000)16:3(58).

Nyameke, E., Haapasalo, H., & Aaltonen, K. (2020). Formation of Project Identity in a Multi-Project Environment. International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, 9(1), 3–25.

Pekuri, A., Pekuri, L., & Haapasalo, H. (2015). Business models and project selection in construction companies. Construction Innovation, 15(2), p.180, doi: 10.1108/CI-12-2013-0055.

Puusa, A., & Tolvanen, U. (2006). Organisational Identity and Trust. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organisation Studies. Vol. 11, No. 2.

Roberson, Q. M. (2019). Diversity in the Workplace: A review, synthesis, and future research agenda. annual review of Organisational psychology and Organisational behaviour. Villanova School of Business, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania 19085, USA.

Rutitis, D., Batraga, A., Muizniece, L., & Ritovs, K. (2012). Management of Corporate Identity Dimensions in the Health Care. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 58, pp.995–1003, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1079.

Rutten, M., Dore´e, A., & Halman, J. (2009). Innovation and interorganisational cooperation: a synthesis of literature. Construction Innovation, 9, 285–97, doi: 10.1108/14714170910973501.

Ruuska, I., Artto, K., Aaltonen, K., & Lehtonen, P. (2009). Dimensions of distance in a project network: Exploring Olkiluoto 3 nuclear power plant project. International Journal of Project Management 27, 142–153, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.09.003.

Saukko, L., Aaltonen, K., & Haapasalo, H. (2020). Inter-Organisational collaboration challenges and preconditions in industrial engineering projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. Vol. 13 No. 5, 2020 pp. 999-1023, doi: 10.1108/IJMPB-10-2019-0250.

Schultz, M., & Hernes. (2013). A Temporal Perspective on Organisational Identity. Organisation Science 24(1):1-21, doi: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0731.

Scott, S. G., & Lane, V. R. (2000). A stakeholder approach to Organisational identity, Academy of Management review, 25, 43–62, doi: 10.5465/amr.2000.2791602.

Silvola R., Jaaskelainen, O., Kropsu‐Vehkapera H., & Haapasalo H. (2011). Managing one Master data – challenges and preconditions. Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 111 Issue: 1, Pp.146-162, doi: 10.1108/02635571111099776.

Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods. Wiley, New York.

Touran, A., Gransberg, D. D., Molenaar, K. R., & Ghavamifar, K. (2011). Selection of project delivery method in transit: Drivers and objectives. Journal of Management in Engineering, 27(1), 21–27, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000027.

Tsaturyan, T., & Müller, R. (2015). Integration and governance of multiple project management Offices at large Organisations. International Journal of Project Management 33 (2015) 1098–1110, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.01.003.

Varajão, J., Colomo-Palacios, R., & Silva, H. (2017). ISO 21500:2012 and PMBoK 5 processes in information systems project management. Computer Standards and Interfaces 50 (2017) 216–222, doi: 10.1016/j.csi.2016.09.007.

Van de Ven, A. H., & Ring, P. S. (2006). Relying on trust in cooperative inter-Organisational relationships, in Bachmann, R., Zaheer, A. (Eds), Handbook of Trust Research. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 144-64.

Walker, D. H. T., & Lloyd-Walker, B. M. (2015). Collaborative Project Procurement Arrangements. Project Management Institute, Newtown Square PA.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




______________________________________________________________________________

The Journal of Modern PM (ISSN: 2317-3963) | info@journalmodernpm.com