:::

An Improved Alternative to Heat Map Risk Matrices for Project Risk Prioritization

Jamie P. Monat, Scott M. Doremus

Abstract


In a previous article we discussed the weaknesses of the popular heat map style risk matrix for project risk prioritization, and we proposed an alternative called the risk adjusted loss (RAL) method. Although the RAL method demonstrated significant improvement, there were mechanical as well as interpretive issues associated with it. This paper describes improvements to the RAL method and experimentally demonstrates its superiority over the heat map style risk matrix for prioritizing project risks.


Keywords


Project Risk Management; Heat Map; Risk-Adjusted Loss

References


Aven, Terje. (2017). “Improving Risk Characterisations in Practical Situations by Highlighting Knowledge Aspects, with Applications to Risk Matrices,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety 167, 42-48

Ball, David J., and J. Watt. (2013). “Further Thoughts on the Utility of Risk Matrices,” Risk Analysis 33 (11), 2068-2078

Clemen, Robert T. and Reilly, Terence. (2014). Making Hard Decisions with DecisionTools, 3rd Ed., South-Western Cengage Learning, Mason, OH, pp. 640-654

Cox, L. A. Jr. (2008). What’s Wrong with Risk Matrices? Risk Analysis, 28(2), 497.

Cox, L. A. Jr., as quoted in Hubbard, Douglas W. (2009). The Failure of Risk Management, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, p. 123

Duijm, Nijs Jan. (2015). “Recommendations On the Use and Design of Risk Matrices,” Safety Science, 76, pp. 21-31

Hubbard, Douglas W. (2009). The Failure of Risk Management, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 122-125

Kahneman, Daniel and Tversky, Amos (1979). "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk" (PDF). Econometrica 47 (2): 263–291. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.407.1910. doi:10.2307/1914185. ISSN 0012-9682. JSTOR 1914185.

Microsoft (2017), “Risk Management Process Overview,” https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc535304.aspx

Monat, Jamie, and Doremus, Scott, (2018). “Deficiencies in and Alternatives to Heat Map Risk Matrices for Project Risk Prioritization,” Journal of Modern Project Management, 104-112, DOI Number 10.19255/JMPM01611

Oboni, Franco, and Oboni, Cesar. (2013). “What You Need to Know About Risk Management Methods,” Riskope International, Vancouver, BC, Canada, www.riskope.com

Pickering, Alexander, and Cowley, Stephen P. (2010). “Risk Matrices: Implied Accuracy and False Assumptions,” J. of Health and Safety Research and Practice, 2 (1), 9-16

Project Management Institute (2008). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® guide)—Fourth edition. Newtown Square, PA

Systems Engineering Process Office. (2002). 212, Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, “Risk Management Process,” PR-SPP-04 v3.0

Thomas, Philip, Bratvold, Reidar, and Bickel, J. Eric. (2014). “The Risk of Using Risk Matrices,” SPE Economics and Management 6 (2), 56-66

Wall, Kent D. (2011). “The Trouble with Risk Matrices,” Naval Postgraduate School (DRMI) Working Paper

Wijnia, Ype. (2012). “Asset Risk Management: Issues in the Design and Use of the Risk Matrix,” In: Mathew J., Ma L., Tan A., Weijnen M., Lee J. (Eds.) Engineering Asset Management and Infrastructure Sustainability, Springer, London, 1043-1059 


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




______________________________________________________________________________

The Journal of Modern PM (ISSN: 2317-3963) | info@journalmodernpm.com