Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

A PLM components monitoring framework for SMEs based on a PLM maturity model and FAHP methodology

Haiqing Zhang, Aicha Sekhari, Yacine Ouzrout, Abdelaziz Bouras


Abstract—Right PLM components selection and investments increase business advantages. This paper develops a PLM components monitoring framework to assess and guide PLM implementation in small and middle enterprises (SMEs). The framework builds upon PLM maturity models and decision-making methodology. PLM maturity model has the capability to analyze PLM functionalities and evaluate PLM components. A proposed PLM components maturity assessment (PCMA) model can obtain general maturity levels of PLM components based on key performance indicators. Investment decisions should be made from the relatively weaker PLM components based on the results of PCMA. One developed method of the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (Fuzzy AHP) is applied to extract the premier improvement component needed. The results of a first empirical assessment in a swimming industry are presented, which could be used as benchmark data for the other Small and Medium sized Enterprises (SMEs) to develop their own PLM components monitoring framework to increase the success of their PLM implementation.


PLM components monitoring framework; PLM maturity model; Fuzzy AHP methodology; PLM components maturity assessment; PLM benefits


Stark, J., (2005). Product Lifecycle Management-21Century Paradigm for Product Realization, Springer-Verlag, London.

Sharma, A. (2005) “Collaborative Product Innovation: Integrating Elements of CPI via PLM Framework.” Computer-Aided Design 37 (13) (November): 1425–1434.

Batenburg, R., Helms,R.W. and Versendaal,J. (2006) PLM roadmap: stepwise PLM implementation based on the concepts of maturity and alignment, Int. J. Product Lifecycle Management, Vol.1,No.4,pp. 333-351.

Saaksvuori, A., Immonen, A., (2008). Product lifecycle management. Springer.

Bensiek, T., Kuehn, A., (2012). Maturity Model for Improving Virtual Engineering in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, in: Product Lifecycle Management. Towards Knowledge-Rich Enterprises. Springer, pp. 635–645.

PLMIG, PLM Interest Group (2007) PLM Maturity Reference Manual. Version 1.0, 19 March.

Dayan, R., Evans, S., 2006. KM your way to CMMI. Journal Of Knowledge Management 10, No 1, 69–80.

Van Looy, Amy, and Geert Poels. (2012). “Towards a Decision Tool for Choosing a Business Process Maturity Model.” In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems: Advances in Theory and Practice, 78–87.

Paulk, M.C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M.B., Weber, C.V., (1993). Capability maturity model, version 1.1. IEEE Software 10, 18 –27.

CMMI Overview. Software Engineering Institute. Accessed 16 February 2011.3

Alfaraj, H.M., Qin, S., (2011). Operationalising CMMI: integrating CMMI and CoBIT perspective. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology 9, 323–335.

Curtis, B., Hefley, B., Miller, J., (2009). People Capability Maturity Model (P-CMM) Version 2.0, Second Edition. Pittsburgh, PA, Carnegie Mellon University.

Zhang, Haiqing, Yacine Ouzrout, Abdelaziz Bouras, Vincenzo Della Selva, and Matteo Mario Savino. 2013. “Selection of Product Lifecycle Management Components Based on AHP Methodologies.” In Advanced Logistics and Transport (ICALT), 2013 International Conference On, 523–528.

H. Zhang, Y. Ouzrout, A. Bouras, A. Mazza, M. Savino . “PLM Components Selection Based on a Maturity Assessment and AHP Methodology”. International Conference on Product Lifecycle Management Conference (PLM’13), Nantes, France, 6-10July, 2013.

Haiqing Zhang , Yacine Ouzrout , Abdelaziz Bouras , Matteo Mario Savino. (2013) “Sustainability consideration within Product Lifecycle Management through Maturity Models Analysis”. Int. J. Services and Operations Management, Accepted.

Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., & Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy sets and Systems, 11(1), 199-227.

Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy sets and systems,17(3), 233-247.

Chang, D. Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP.European journal of operational research, 95(3), 649-655.

Xu, R. (2000). Fuzzy least-squares priority method in the analytic hierarchy process. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 112(3), 395-404.

Csutora, R., & Buckley, J. J. (2001). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis: the Lambda-Max method. Fuzzy sets and Systems, 120(2), 181-195.

Mikhailov, L., & Tsvetinov, P. (2004). Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Applied Soft Computing, 5(1), 23-33.

Srdjevic, B. (2005). Combining different prioritization methods in the analytic hierarchy process synthesis. Computers & Operations Research, 32(7), 1897-1919.

Wang, Y. M., Elhag, T., & Hua, Z. (2006). A modified fuzzy logarithmic least squares method for fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,157(23), 3055-3071.

Yu, J. R., & Cheng, S. J. (2007). An integrated approach for deriving priorities in analytic network process. European Journal of Operational Research, 180(3), 1427-1432.

L. A. Huo, J. B. Lan and Z. X. Wang, “New Parametric Prioritization Methods for an Analytical Hierarchy Process Based on a Pairwise Comparison Matrix,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, Vol. 54, No. 11-12, 2011, pp. 2736-2749.

Rezaei, Jafar, Roland Ortt, and Victor Scholten. 2012. “An Improved Fuzzy Preference Programming to Evaluate Entrepreneurship Orientation.” Applied Soft Computing (December). doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2012.11.012.

R. Bellman, L.A. Zadeh, (1970). Decision-making in a fuzzy environment, Management Science. 17 (4) 141–164.

Full Text: PDF


  • There are currently no refbacks.


The Journal of Modern PM (ISSN: 2317-3963) | info@journalmodernpm.com