:::

The complex project complexity – Identification of five ideal research types

Mogens Frank Mikkelsen

Abstract


The concept of project complexity has evolved a tremendously since topic discussions were initiated. A diversification was sparked a decade ago. The multiplicity of concepts makes it increasingly challenging to utilize the overall research stream of project complexity. This paper takes stock and presents a typology with five ideal types of research in project complexity. This demonstrate an overarching relation between the type of research of project complexity and the inherent perspective on project success. The typology contributes a much-needed overview for researchers who are new to the overall topic of project complexity. The complexity of projects is an important aspect of research of rethinking of project management, and the typology has the potential of forming a theory of project complexity supporting this research.

 


Keywords


Ideal types, project complexity, project success

References


Ahern, T., Leavy, B., & Byrne, P. (2014). Complex project management as complex problem solving: A distributed knowledge management perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1371-1381.

Aken, J. E. v. (2004). Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: the quest for field‐tested and grounded technological rules. Journal of management studies, 41(2), 219-246.

Arnold, R. D., & Wade, J. P. (2015). A definition of systems thinking: a systems approach. Procedia Computer Science, 44, 669-678.

Augustine, S., Payne, B., Sencindiver, F., & Woodcock, S. (2005). Agile project management: steering from the edges. Communications of the ACM, 48(12), 85-89.

Baccarini, D. (1996). The concept of project complexity—a review. International Journal of Project Management, 14(4), 201-204.

Baccarini, D. (1999). The logical framework method for defining project success. Project Management Journal, 30, 25-32.

Bakhshi, J., Ireland, V., & Gorod, A. (2016). Clarifying the project complexity construct: Past, present and future. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7), 1199-1213.

Bennett, C. (2001). Genres of research in multicultural education. Review of educational research, 71(2), 171-217.

Bhaskar, R. (2013). A realist theory of science: Routledge.

Bjorvatn, T., & Wald, A. (2018). Project complexity and team-level absorptive capacity as drivers of project management performance. International Journal of Project Management, 36(6), 876-888.

Borko, H., Liston, D., & Whitcomb, J. A. (2007). Genres of empirical research in teacher education. In: Sage Publications Sage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA.

Bosch-Rekveldt, M., Jongkind, Y., Mooi, H., Bakker, H., & Verbraeck, A. (2011). Grasping project complexity in large engineering projects: The TOE (Technical, Organizational and Environmental) framework. International Journal of Project Management, 29(6), 728-739.

Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences: MIT press.

Bowman, G., & Crawford, L. (2017). Embracing emergence: problem solving on complex projects. International Research Network on Organizing by Projects (IRNOP) 2017, UTS ePRESS, Sydney: NSW. In.

Brockmann, C., & Girmscheid, G. (2007). Complexity of megaprojects. Paper presented at the CIB World Building Congress: construction for development: 14-17 May 2007, Cape Town International Convention Centre, South Africa.

Bueno, S., & Gallego, M. D. (2017). Managing top management support in complex information systems projects: An end-user empirical study. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 19(1/2), 151-164.

Byrne, D. (2002). Complexity theory and the social sciences: An introduction: Routledge.

Chakkol, M., Selviaridis, K., & Finne, M. (2018). The governance of collaboration in complex projects. International journal of operations & production management, 38(4), 997-1019.

Chapman, R. J. (2016). A framework for examining the dimensions and characteristics of complexity inherent within rail megaprojects. International Journal of Project Management, 34(6), 937-956.

Cicmil, S., Williams, T., Thomas, J., & Hodgson, D. (2006). Rethinking project management: researching the actuality of projects. International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), 675-686.

Cooke-Davies, T., Cicmil, S., Crawford, L., & Richardson, K. (2007). We're not in Kansas anymore, Toto: Mapping the strange landscape of complexity theory, and its relationship to project management. Project Management Journal, 38(2), 50.

Daniel, P. A., & Daniel, C. (2018). Complexity, uncertainty and mental models: From a paradigm of regulation to a paradigm of emergence in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 184-197.

Dao, B., Kermanshachi, S., Shane, J., Anderson, S., & Hare, E. (2016). Exploring and Assessing Project Complexity. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(5), 04016126.

Davies, A., Dodgson, M., & Gann, D. (2016). Dynamic capabilities in complex projects: The case of London Heathrow Terminal 5. Project Management Journal, 47(2), 26-46.

Davies, A., & Mackenzie, I. (2014). Project complexity and systems integration: Constructing the London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics Games. International Journal of Project Management, 32(5), 773-790.

Davis, K. (2017). An empirical investigation into different stakeholder groups perception of project success. International Journal of Project Management, 35(4), 604-617.

de Rezende, L. B., & Blackwell, P. (2019). Revisiting project complexity: a new dimension and framework. The Journal of Modern Project Management, 6(3).

Dewey, J. (1916). The pragmatism of Peirce. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 13(26), 709-715.

Dooley, K. J. (1997). A complex adaptive systems model of organization change. Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences, 1(1), 69-97.

Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. J. A. o. m. r. (1994). Typologies as a unique form of theory building: Toward improved understanding and modeling. 19(2), 230-251.

Eriksson, P. E., Larsson, J., & Pesämaa, O. (2017). Managing complex projects in the infrastructure sector—A structural equation model for flexibility-focused project management. International Journal of Project Management, 35(8), 1512-1523.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2007). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative research practice, 390-404.

Geraldi, J., Maylor, H., & Williams, T. (2011). Now, let's make it really complex (complicated) A systematic review of the complexities of projects. International journal of operations & production management, 31(9), 966-990.

Geraldi, J., & Söderlund, J. (2016). Project studies and engaged scholarship: Directions towards contextualized and reflexive research on projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 9(4), 767-797.

Giezen, M. (2012). Keeping it simple? A case study into the advantages and disadvantages of reducing complexity in mega project planning. International Journal of Project Management, 30(7), 781-790.

Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information systems. MIS quarterly, 611-642.

Hanna, J. F. J. S. (1969). Explanation, prediction, description, and information theory. 20(3), 308-334.

Hass, K. B. (2008). Managing Complex Projects: A New Model: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Hass, K. B., & PMP, K. B. H. (2008). Managing complex projects: A new model: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

He, Q., Luo, L., Hu, Y., & Chan, A. P. (2015). Measuring the complexity of mega construction projects in China—A fuzzy analytic network process analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 33(3), 549-563.

Holland, J. H. (1992). Complex adaptive systems. Daedalus, 17-30.

Holland, J. H. (2006). Studying complex adaptive systems. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 19(1), 1-8.

Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (1999). Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American planning association, 65(4), 412-423.

Jepson, J. M., Kirytopoulos, K., & London, K. (2017). Exploring project managers' perception of stress when working in increasingly complex construction projects. Construction Economics and Building, 17(3), 47.

Joslin, R., & Müller, R. (2015). Relationships between a project management methodology and project success in different project governance contexts. International Journal of Project Management, 33(6), 1377-1392.

Jucevičius, G., & Grumadaitė, K. (2014). Smart development of innovation ecosystem. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 156, 125-129.

Jaafari, A. (2003). Project management in the age of complexity and change. Project Management Journal, 34(4), 47-57.

Kermanshachi, S., Dao, B., Shane, J., & Anderson, S. (2016). An empirical study into identifying project complexity management strategies. Procedia Engineering, 145, 603-610.

Kian Manesh Rad, E. (2016). Development of a project complexity assessment method for energy megaprojects. Heriot-Watt University,

Kian, M. E., Sun, M., & Bosché, F. (2016). A consistency-checking consensus-building method to assess complexity of energy megaprojects. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 226, 43-50.

Kiridena, S., & Sense, A. (2016). Profiling project complexity: Insights from complexity science and project management literature. Project Management Journal, 47(6), 56-74.

Klein, G., Moon, B., & Hoffman, R. R. (2006). Making sense of sensemaking 1: Alternative perspectives. IEEE intelligent systems(4), 70-73.

Leavy, P. (2014). The Oxford handbook of qualitative research: Oxford library of psychology.

Lessard, D., Sakhrani, V., & Miller, R. J. E. P. O. J. (2014). House of Project Complexity—understanding complexity in large infrastructure projects. 4(4), 170-192.

Lu, Y., Luo, L., Wang, H., Le, Y., & Shi, Q. (2015). Measurement model of project complexity for large-scale projects from task and organization perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 33(3), 610-622.

Lund, C. (2014). Of what is this a case?: analytical movements in qualitative social science research. Human organization, 73(3), 224-234.

Luo, L., He, Q., Jaselskis, E. J., & Xie, J. (2017). Construction project complexity: research trends and implications. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(7), 04017019.

Luo, L., He, Q., Xie, J., Yang, D., & Wu, G. (2016). Investigating the relationship between project complexity and success in complex construction projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 33(2), 04016036.

Marle, F., & Vidal, L.-A. (2016). Limits of Traditional Project Management Approaches When Facing Complexity. In Managing Complex, High Risk Projects (pp. 53-74): Springer.

May, T. (2011). A new neo-pragmatism: From James and Dewey to Foucault. Foucault Studies(11), 54-62.

Maylor, H., Vidgen, R., & Carver, S. (2008). Managerial complexity in project-based operations: A grounded model and its implications for practice. Project Management Journal, 39(1_suppl), S15-S26.

Maylor, H. R., Turner, N. W., & Murray-Webster, R. (2013). How hard can it be?: actively managing complexity in technology projects. Research-Technology Management, 56(4), 45-51.

McLeod, L., Doolin, B., & MacDonell, S. G. (2012). A perspective‐based understanding of project success. Project Management Journal, 43(5), 68-86.

Mikkelsen, M. (2018). Projects, success, and complexity. International Project Management Association Research Conference 2017, UTS ePRESS, Sydney: NSW. In.

Mir, F. A., & Pinnington, A. H. (2014). Exploring the value of project management: linking project management performance and project success. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 202-217.

Morgan, D. L. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of mixed methods research, 1(1), 48-76.

Morris, P. (2013). Reconstructing project management reprised: A knowledge perspective. Project Management Journal, 44(5), 6-23.

Munkvold, B. E., & Bygstad, B. (2016). The Land of Confusion–Clearing up some common misunderstandings of interpretive research. Paper presented at the NOKOBIT-Norsk konferanse for organisasjoners bruk av informasjonsteknologi.

Müller, R., Geraldi, J., & Turner, J. R. (2012). Relationships between leadership and success in different types of project complexities. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 59(1), 77-90.

Neuman, W. L. (2013). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches: Pearson education.

Nguyen, A. T., Nguyen, L. D., Le-Hoai, L., & Dang, C. N. (2015). Quantifying the complexity of transportation projects using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Project Management, 33(6), 1364-1376.

Nias, J. (1987). Teaching and the self. Cambridge journal of Education, 17(3), 178-185.

Niknazar, P., & Bourgault, M. (2017). Theories for classification vs. classification as theory: Implications of classification and typology for the development of project management theories. International Journal of Project Management, 35(2), 191-203.

OGC. (2009). Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2TM.

Orlikowski, W. J., & Baroudi, J. J. (1991). Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information systems research, 2(1), 1-28.

Padalkar, M., & Gopinath, S. (2016). Are complexity and uncertainty distinct concepts in project management? A taxonomical examination from literature. International Journal of Project Management, 34(4), 688-700.

Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., & Niehaves, B. (2018). Design science research genres: introduction to the special issue on exemplars and criteria for applicable design science research. In: Taylor & Francis.

Pollack, J., Biesenthal, C., Sankaran, S., & Clegg, S. (2018). Classics in megaproject management: a structured analysis of three major works. International Journal of Project Management, 36(2), 372-384.

Project Management Institute, P. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)—Sixth Edition (Vol. ).

Pryke, S., & Smyth, H. (2012). The management of complex projects: A relationship approach: John Wiley & Sons.

Qureshi, S. M., & Kang, C. (2015). Analysing the organizational factors of project complexity using structural equation modelling. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 165-176.

Remington, K. (2016). Leading complex projects: Routledge.

Remington, K., & Pollack, J. (2008). Complex Projects: What are they and how can we manage them more effectively? Paper presented at the AIPM Project Management Conference.

Remington, K., Zolin, R., & Turner, R. (2009). A model of project complexity: distinguishing dimensions of complexity from severity. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 9th International Research Network of Project Management Conference.

Rowe, F. (2012). Toward a richer diversity of genres in information systems research: new categorization and guidelines. In: Springer.

Sayer, A. (1999). Realism and social science: Sage.

Saynisch, M. (2010). Beyond frontiers of traditional project management: An approach to evolutionary, self‐organizational principles and the complexity theory—results of the research program. Project Management Journal, 41(2), 21-37.

Snowden, D. J., & Boone, M. E. (2007). A leader's framework for decision making. Harvard business review, 85(11), 68.

Sohi, A. J., Hertogh, M., Bosch-Rekveldt, M., & Blom, R. (2016). Does lean & agile project management help coping with project complexity? Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 226, 252-259.

Southgate, D. (1993). The Editors' dilemma. British Journal of Nutrition, 69(3), 615-616.

Svejvig, P., & Andersen, P. (2015). Rethinking project management: A structured literature review with a critical look at the brave new world. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 278-290.

Swales, J. (2014). Genre and discourse community. The Discourse Studies Reader: Main currents in theory and analysis, 305-316.

Te'eni, D., Rowe, F., Ågerfalk, P. J., & Lee, J. S. (2015). Publishing and getting published in EJIS: marshaling contributions for a diversity of genres. In: Taylor & Francis.

Tsoukas, H. (2017). Don't simplify, complexify: From disjunctive to conjunctive theorizing in organization and management studies. Journal of management studies, 54(2), 132-153.

Van Marrewijk, A., Clegg, S. R., Pitsis, T. S., & Veenswijk, M. (2008). Managing public–private megaprojects: Paradoxes, complexity, and project design. International Journal of Project Management, 26(6), 591-600.

Vidal, L.-A., & Marle, F. (2008). Understanding project complexity: implications on project management. Kybernetes, 37(8), 1094-1110.

Vidal, L.-A., Marle, F., & Bocquet, J.-C. (2011). Measuring project complexity using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Project Management, 29(6), 718-727.

Whitty, S. J., & Maylor, H. (2007). And then came complex project management. Paper presented at the 21st IPMA World Congress on Project Management.

Whitty, S. J., & Maylor, H. (2009). And then came complex project management (revised). International Journal of Project Management, 27(3), 304-310.

Williams, T. (2017). The nature of risk in complex projects. Project Management Journal, 48(4), 55-66.

Williams, T., Jonny Klakegg, O., Walker, D. H., Andersen, B., & Morten Magnussen, O. (2012). Identifying and acting on early warning signs in complex projects. Project Management Journal, 43(2), 37-53.

Williams, T. M. (1999). The need for new paradigms for complex projects. International Journal of Project Management, 17(5), 269-273.

Winter, M., & Smith, C. (2006). Rethinking project management. Final Rep.

Xia, W., & Lee, G. (2004). Grasping the complexity of IS development projects. Communications of the ACM, 47(5), 68-74.

Zhu, J., & Mostafavi, A. (2017). Discovering complexity and emergent properties in project systems: A new approach to understanding project performance. International Journal of Project Management, 35(1), 1-12.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




______________________________________________________________________________

The Journal of Modern PM (ISSN: 2317-3963) | info@journalmodernpm.com