:::
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

What is a program: An examination of terminology in practitioner reference documents

Stephen Keith McGrath, Stephen Jonathan Whitty

Abstract


Previous published work has identified confusion in definition of the term program. This paper examines program terminology across a range of project management practitioner reference documents to determine if there is any definitional confusion within or between them and whether the boundaries with project and portfolio levels are clear. The examination finds that there are indeed inconsistencies in program terminology between the documents analyzed making it difficult to know where the boundaries with project and portfolio lie. A set of mutually consistent definitions of terms including all three words is then developed using an established method.

Keywords


portfolio management; program management; programme management; project management; transformation

References


Association for Project Management. (2012). Apm body of knowledge (Sixth edition. ed.).

Australian Standards. (2016). As iso 21500:2016 guidance on project management. In. Sydney: SAI Global.

Author Withheld. (2018). A typology of meanings: Practitioners views of ‘program’. Project Management Research and Practice, In Press.

AXELOS. (2017). Managing successful projects with PRINCE2. In (pp. 430). Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com.ezproxy.usq.edu.au/lib/usq/detail.action?docID=4863041.

British Standards International. (2002). Bs6079-2:2000 project management - part 2: Vocabulary. In. London: BSI.

Crawford, L., Pollack, J., & England, D. (2007). How standard are standards: An examination of language emphasis in project management standards. Project Management Journal, 38(3), 6-21. doi:10.1002/pmj.20002

Gallie, W. B. (1956). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 167-198.

Kang, S. P. (2015). Change management: Term confusion and new classifications. Performance Improvement, 54(3), 26-32. doi:10.1002/pfi.21466

McGrath, S. K., & Whitty, S. J. (2013). Do steering committees and boards constitute good project governance? Paper presented at the 10th Annual Project Management Australia Conference (PMOz 2013), Melbourne, Australia.

McGrath, S. K., & Whitty, S. J. (2015). Redefining governance: From confusion to certainty and clarity. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 8(4), 755-787. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-10-2014-0071

McGrath, S. K., & Whitty, S. J. (2017). Stakeholder defined. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 10(4), 721-748. doi:doi:10.1108/IJMPB-12-2016-0097

Mill, J. S. (1874). A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive (Eighth ed.). New York: Harper & Brothers.

Muller, R., & Shao, J. (2013). A model of the dynamics in theory development. In N. Drouin, R. Muller, & S. Sankaran (Eds.), Novel approaches to organisational project management (pp. 136-161): Copenhagen Business School Press.

Office of Government Commerce (OGC). (2011). Managing successful programmes. Great Britain: The Stationery Office.

Oxford. Dictionaries online. Retrieved from http://oxforddictionaries.com

Project Management Institute. (2013a). Guide to the project management body of knowledge (pmbok guide) (Fifth ed.). Newtown Square, Pennsylvania: Project Management Institute, Inc.

Project Management Institute. (2013b). The standard for portfolio management. In. Retrieved from http://common.books24x7.com.ezproxy.usq.edu.au/toc.aspx?bookid=51358

Project Management Institute. (2013c). The standard for program management. In. Retrieved from http://common.books24x7.com.ezproxy.usq.edu.au/toc.aspx?bookid=51357

Project Management Institute. (2017). Guide to the project management body of knowledge (pmbok guide) (Sixth ed.). Newtown Square PA: Project Management Institute.

Rehacek, P. (2014). Standards iso 21500 and pmbok guide for project management. International Journal of Engineering Science and Innovative Technology, 3(1), 288-295.

Rehacek, P. (2017). Application and usage of the standards for project management and their comparison. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 12(4), 994-1002.

Reiss, G. (2007). Universal disagreement: - the many views of programme management. Retrieved from http://pmi.org.uk/en/events/london.cfm/universal_disagreement

Sadeanu, M., Candea, S., & Bodea, C. N. (2013). Iso 21500:2012 vs. Other project management standards. In N. Grau & C. N. Bodea (Eds.), ISO 21500 Project Management Standard: Characteristics, Comparison and Implementation. Aachen: SHAKER Verlag.

Wideman, R. M. (2017). Wideman comparative glossary of project management terms v3.1. Retrieved from http://www.maxwideman.com/pmglossary/index.htm

Xue, R., Baron, C., Esteban, P., & Zheng , L. (2015). Analysis and comparison of project management standards and guides. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Conference on Mechanics, Materials, Mechanical Engineering and Chemical Engineering (MMMCE 2015) Barcelona, Spain.

Zandhius, A., & Stellingwerf, R. (2013). Iso 21500 guidance on project management: A pocket guide Van Haren Publishing, Zaltbommel.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




______________________________________________________________________________

The Journal of Modern PM (ISSN: 2317-3963) | info@journalmodernpm.com