:::
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

The dynamics of innovation drivers: client requirements and sustainable energy innovation uptake

Satu Reijonen, Rebecca Pinheiro Croisel

Abstract


Despite growing interest, sustainable energy innovations encounter difficulties in attaining market success. This paper investigates the role of requirements set up by the clients in generating more conducive conditions for sustainable energy innovations in building projects. With the help of two case studies we identify three dynamics provoked by specific client objectives with a focus on sustainability: the dynamics of exploration beyond the habitual ways, the dynamics of future inclusion and the dynamics of verification. By provoking these dynamics, client requirements change the prevailing level of ambition of the project and the ways in which the benefits and costs are calculated. They thereby create a strong entanglement of the sustainable energy innovation and the design project. Furthermore, the dynamics tend to favour the uptake of existing innovations rather than generating completely novel solutions. The article concludes with a discussion on the possibilities of policy intervention for innovation supportive dynamics in construction projects.

Keywords


innovation; project management, sustainable energy; processuality; client; geothermal heating; bio-climatic design

References


Akrich, M. (1992) The De-Scription of Technical Objects, in Shaping Technology / Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change, eds. W.E. Bijker and J. Law, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 205-224.

Akrich, M., Callon, M. and Latour, B. June (1988 in French) (2002) The key to success in innovation part II: the art of choosing good spokespersons. International Journal of Innovation Management, 6(2) 207-225.

Bröchner, J. (2010) Construction contractors as service innovators. Building Research and Information, 38(3) 235-246.

Callon, M. 1998. An essay on framing and overflowing: economic externalities revisited by sociology. In M. Callon (ed.) The Laws of the Markets. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers/The Sociological Review. pp. 244-269.

Cochoy, F (2008). Calculation, qualculation, calqulation: shopping cart arithmetic, equipped cognition and the clustered consumer. Marketing Theory, 8(1) 15-44.

de Laet, M. and Mol, A. April (2000) The Zimbabwe Bush Pump: Mechanics of a Fluid Technology. Social Studies of Science, 30(2) 225--263.

Gann, D.M., Wang, Y. and Hawkins, R. (1998) Do regulations encourage innovation? - the case of energy efficiency in housing. Building Research and Information, 26(5) 280-296.

Hardie, M. (2010) Influences on innovation in small Australian construction businesses. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 17(3) 387-402.

Hartman, A. (2006) The context of innovation management in construction firms. Construction Management and Economics, 24(6) 567-578.

Harty, C. (2010) Implementing innovation: designers, users and actor-networks. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 22(3) 297-315.

Harty, C. (2008) Implementing innovation in construction: contexts, relative boundedness and actor-network theory. Construction Management and Economics, 26(10) 1029-1041.

Harty, C. (2005) Innovation in construction: a sociology of technology approach. Building Research and Information, 33(6) 512-522.

Ivory, C. (2005) The cult of customer responsiveness: is design innovation the price of a client‐focused construction industry? Construction Management and Economics, 23(8) 861-870.

Jacobsson, M. and Linderoth, H.C.J. (2010) The influence of contextual elements, actors' frames of reference, and technology on the adoption and use of ICT in construction projects: a Swedish case study. Construction Management and Economics, 28(1) 13-23.

Koskela, L. and Vrijhoef, R. (2001) Is the current theory of construction a hindrance to innovation? Building Research and Information, 29(3) 197-207.

Latour, B. (1996) Aramis or the Love of Technology, Harvard University Press, Massachutes.

Manley, K. (2008) Against the odds: Small firms in Australia successfully introducing new technology on construction projects. Research Policy, 37(10) 1751-1764.

Manley, K. (2006) The innovation competence of repeat public sector clients in the Australian construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 24(12) 1295-1304.

Nam, C.H. and Tatum, C.B. (1988) Major characteristics of constructed products and resulting limitations of construction technology, Construction Management and Economics, 6(2) 133.

Peuportier, Bruno 2008, Éco-conception des bâtiments et des quartiers , Presses de l'École des Mines, Paris.

Pries, F. and Dorée, A. (2005) A century of innovation in the Dutch construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 23(6) 561-564.

Reichstein, T., Salter, A.J. and Gann, D.M. (2005) Last among equals: a comparison of innovation in construction, services and manufacturing in the UK. Construction Management and Economics, 23 (6) 631-644.

Schweber, L. and Harty, C. (2010) Actors and objects: a socio-technical networks approach to technology uptake in the construction sector. Construction Management and Economics, 28(6) 657-674.

Seaden, G., Guolla, M., Doutriaux, J. and Nash, J. (2003) Strategic decisions and innovation in construction firms. Construction Management and Economics, 21(6) 603-612.

Shu-Ling Lu and Sexton, M. (2006) Innovation in small construction knowledge‐intensive professional service firms: a case study of an architectural practice. Construction Management and Economics, 24(12) 1269-1282.

Winch, G. (1998) Zephyrs of creative destruction: understanding the management of innovation in construction. Building Research and Information, 26(5) 268-279.

Yin, R. K. (1981). The case study crisis: some answers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26 58-65.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




______________________________________________________________________________

The Journal of Modern PM (ISSN: 2317-3963) | info@journalmodernpm.com